<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PUSH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iratefilms.com/2009/02/push/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iratefilms.com/reviews/film-reviews/push/</link>
	<description>Viciously  ruthless South Florida movie and film reviews for the average Joe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 03:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knigge</title>
		<link>http://iratefilms.com/reviews/film-reviews/push/comment-page-1/#comment-9115</link>
		<dc:creator>Knigge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iratefilms.com/?p=2879#comment-9115</guid>
		<description>I disagree. I&#039;d give it 2 and a half stars. Nice concept, acting, and action scenes. BORING as hell story and not enough action. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. I&#039;d give it 2 and a half stars. Nice concept, acting, and action scenes. BORING as hell story and not enough action. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amadarwin</title>
		<link>http://iratefilms.com/reviews/film-reviews/push/comment-page-1/#comment-9116</link>
		<dc:creator>Amadarwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iratefilms.com/?p=2879#comment-9116</guid>
		<description>I can see the not enough action part - hell, I can agree with it since I wanted more myself. A story like this probably could have used a bit more action, but the running time would have to be adjusted. But boring story? I&#039;d have to disagree. It was pretty straight forward as far as that goes, hitting all the marks of the plot quickly and concisely, keeping time with the fast pace of the film. I think how they cleverly avoided the Division watchers was ingenious, and while some may think it was a tad obvious, I never would have guessed it.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the not enough action part &#8211; hell, I can agree with it since I wanted more myself. A story like this probably could have used a bit more action, but the running time would have to be adjusted. But boring story? I&#039;d have to disagree. It was pretty straight forward as far as that goes, hitting all the marks of the plot quickly and concisely, keeping time with the fast pace of the film. I think how they cleverly avoided the Division watchers was ingenious, and while some may think it was a tad obvious, I never would have guessed it.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

